CAF Doctrine 3 - Study
Dent 2025.
Series
- CAF Doctrine 1 - Section design
- CAF Doctrine 2 - Section Battle Drills
- CAF Doctrine 3 - BACD
- CAF Doctrine 4 - Study
- CAF Doctrine 5 - Section Attack Lesson Plan
- CAF Doctrine 6 - Terms
Brendan McBreen Three Hundred Assaults
Substack series
Insights extract
a. Find the enemy first
b. Shoot first and shoot the most
c. Read the dirt
d. Advance using fire and movement
e. Avoid enemy machine guns
Also worth reading from McBreen:
Army.ca thread on section attack
Evaluating a Section Attack
https://army.ca/forums/threads/thinking-about-the-infantry-attack.18270/post-1878617
How would I go about evaluating a Section Attack with metrics? First, we
evaluate it through OPFOR enabled force on force NOT live fire. Second, my
though is we first break it down by using the Canadian Army’s war fighting
functions as our base. Some items would be enabled by CUBIC WES and would be
hard numbers, other items would be based on hard yes or no questions derived
from our doctrinal processes. How effective each item under a yes or no answer
would be subjective and therefore why it would be hard to measure other than a
simple yes or no.
Command
- Time from 1st Contact until enemy position engaged with effective fire
- Time from 1st Contact until full contact report sent to higher
- Was a GRIT issued?
- Was an H hour set?
- Were control measures issued?
- Where there any blue on blue casualties? (Speaks to both control measures and
blue SA by soldiers and leaders)
Sense
- Who saw who first? (Speaks to balancing speed vs security in advance, section
movement formations etc.) - What did blue forces think they were engaging vs what the enemy strength actually
was?
Act
- Hit % by weapon system during three phases: Initial contact, direct fire plan
by fire base, assault force engagement after the ceasing of fire base support - Did the fire base meet the direct fire plan timings?
(Speaks to both time and space considerations as well as ammo consumption rates) - Total enemy rounds fired by OPFOR during blue force direct fire plan
(Speaks to effectiveness of suppression) - % of time moving force were not under cover from enemy observation and fires.
Broken out for both Fire base and assault forces
Shield
- What % of the Section is KIA at consolidation
(speaks to use of ground and fire positions etc.) - What % of the Section is WIA at consolidation
(speaks to use of ground and fire positions etc.) - Overall enemy % for the number of rounds OPFOR fired vs Bluefor casualties
- % of Section ammo left upon consolidation
- Were soldiers sited and given defensive ARCs upon culmination of the attack?
Sustain
- Time from soldier receiving wounds to buddy aid being applied?
- Were key weapons systems and/or ammo redistributed from KIA/WIA upon consolidation
The Infantry Section and Platoon in Battle (1996)
This one is available publicly:
B-GL-309-003/FT-001, The Infantry Section and Platoon in Battle (1996).
Canadian Army - Infantry Section and Platoon in Battle
The updated version from 2009 is not available.
B-GL-309-003/FT-00, Section and Platoon in Battle (Draft 2009).
arma3_tactical_guide.pdf
Included in the bonus content folder of the Arma 3 install. Written by Dyslexi, a very insightful guide to all things Arma 3, including Leadership and fire fights.
primaryandsecondary.com
Research - youtube
- 7CMBG - Section Battle Drills (107) - Arma 3 Milsim
- Canadian Forces - 7 Section Battle Drills
- Fire & Maneuver: How Suppressive Fire Works - Teaching Tactics
- TacticalForge1
- USMC MARSOC - Proper Comms Use and Callsigns
- USMC MARSOC - Marine Rifle Platoon Organization
Research - other
Canada
- Canadian Army - Infantry Section and Platoon in Battle(1996)
- Canadian Army - LAV Company Tactics (2003)
- Canada.ca - Professional Military Education Tools
- Canada.ca Templates and Aide-Memoires
- Canada.ca Tactical Planning Aide-Memoire
- Physical demands analysis of typical infantry tasks and missions
- COMMAND: The Operational Function
- Canada Land Operations (2008)
- Canada.ca - Doctrine and Tactics
- Slaughter, maneuver, infantry and psychology
- regimentalrogue.com Part One: Attrition Training
- regimentalrogue.com Part Two: Initiative Is Always an Option
- Organizing Modern Infantry: An Analysis of Section Fighting Power
- Battle Order - Canada's Light Infantry Section (Squad)
US
- Ranger Handbook
- US Army ATP 3-21.8 Infantry Platoon and Squad (2016)
- Commandant of the Marine Corps Professional Reading Program
- Virtual OPFOR Academy
- Virtual OPFOR Academy (VOA) youtube playlist
Anecdotes, quips, sayings, rules of thumb
-
Find, Fix, Flank and Finish
-
Find, Fix, Finish, Follow-Through
-
Half of tactics is dirt
Three Hundred Assaults, Brendan McBreen
-
Fire without maneuver is indecisive, Maneuver without fire is Fatal
USMC
-
The most important six inches on the battlefield is between your ears
General James Mattis USMC
-
An officer can't look scared or tense; it's contagious
Captain Blackstone, Starship Troopers (Book, Chapter 13)
-
Breaking off combat is most easily accomplished after a successful offensive
maneuverRommel, Attacks, page 72
-
Create dilemmas, not problems
General James Mattis USMC
Meta
-
Acronym CAF4
-
UUID document_a8faabf9-da99-4ff0-b254-19ab874b8b84
-
Created 2025-09-19 19:13 UTC (a month ago)
-
Updated 2025-09-25 14:37 UTC (a month ago)